發表人 內 容
Only Chen
發表 发表于:2011.11.02 12:20:20 PM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

Intel:安心升溫 讓雲端資料中心更省電

Only Chen
發表 发表于:2011.10.24 04:27:38 PM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

雲端平台 明年三雄決戰

 

http://news.chinatimes.com/tech/171706/122011102400286.html

Only Chen
發表 发表于:2011.10.20 12:10:59 PM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

惠普雲端中心 半數設亞太

http://news.chinatimes.com/tech/12050903/122011102000377.html

 

Only Chen
發表 发表于:2011.10.14 12:22:20 PM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

中華電、IBM 合推盤古雲端平台

http://news.chinatimes.com/tech/12050903/122011100700338.html

雲端是不可逆潮流,跟當初發明電話與Internet一般! !

Only Chen
發表 发表于:2011.09.21 12:12:06 PM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

電子書包3年內推廣至150校

http://news.chinatimes.com/tech/171702/112011092100051.html

 

Only Chen
發表 发表于:2011.07.22 12:02:30 PM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

宏碁92億併iGware 攻雲端槓蘋果

Only Chen
發表 发表于:2011.06.29 12:03:55 PM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

Google Apps vs. MS-OFFICE 365 --- 微軟推雲端Office 拚Google

http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2011/new/jun/29/today-int1.htm

Only Chen
發表 发表于:2011.03.29 12:13:23 PM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

微軟不排除在台建雲端中心?

http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/110329/78/2ov8n.html

 

Only Chen
發表 发表于:2011.03.22 12:17:48 PM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

Intel的雲端SCC獲得節能獎了

http://chinese.engadget.com/2011/03/21/intel-single-chip-cloud-computer-wins-green-award/

Only Chen
發表 发表于:2011.02.21 12:14:04 PM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

CES、Computex包夾 CeBIT失色 ?

http://news.chinatimes.com/tech/12050901/122011022100210.html

 

Only Chen
發表 发表于:2011.02.21 12:13:08 PM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

CeBIT 強打雲端 3月1日登場

http://news.chinatimes.com/tech/12050901/122011022100209.html

 

Tommy Chung
發表 发表于:2011.01.26 12:24:51 PM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

...工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心(IEK)昨日發布「2011年資通訊產業十大關鍵議題」。IEK預測,2013年全球雲端服務產值上看500億美金(約新台幣1.4兆),再加上3D電視、大陸三網合一、物聯網等新趨勢,將是台灣資通訊產業的新商機。...(中時)

http://news.chinatimes.com/tech/171703/122011012600312.html

 

Tommy Chung
發表 发表于:2011.01.26 12:05:04 PM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

IBM來台建雲端醫療示範點

http://news.chinatimes.com/tech/12050901/122011012600265.html

 

Tommy Chung
發表 发表于:2011.01.03 12:12:54 PM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

經部:台灣雲端研發能量 爆發

http://news.chinatimes.com/tech/0,5249,12050901x122011010300240,00.html

 

Only Chen
發表 发表于:2010.12.29 11:49:02 AM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

Report: Mobile Malware Will Clobber Enterprise Security in 2011

http://www.technewsworld.com/story/Report-Mobile-Malware-Will-Clobber-Enterprise-Security-in-2011-71541.html

 

Tommy Chung
發表 发表于:2010.11.15 11:36:45 AM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

China unseats U.S. in supercomputer ranking

The Jaguar has fallen from the top of the food chain.

When the Top 500 list of the world's most powerful supercomputers is released today, the Cray XT5 system at Oak Ridge National Laboratory and run by the University of Tennessee, called "Jaguar," will drop to No. 2 after a year of eating the lunch of every other supercomputer in the world. In its place will stand Tianhe-1A, a system built by China's National University of Defense Technology, located at the National Supercomputing Center in Tianjin.

Tianhe-1A achieved a performance level of 2.67 petaflop/s (quadrillions of calculations per second). Jaguar achieved 1.75 petaflop/s. Third place went to another Chinese-built system, called Nebulae, which achieved 1.27 petaflop/s.

And while the news of China's achievement is not exactly a surprise, the supercomputing community in the U.S. is looking at it two ways: as both as an assurance that U.S. software and components are still elite in their field, and a wake-up call that the country's prestige in high-performance computing is not a given.

"This is what everybody expected. What the Chinese have done is they're exploiting the power of GPUs (graphic processing unit) which are...awfully close to being uniquely suited to this particular benchmark," said Bill Gropp, computer science professor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champagne, and co-principal investigator of the Blue Waters project, another supercomputer in the works.

The benchmark he's speaking of is the Linpack, which tests the performance of a system for solving a dense system of linear equations. It's measured in calculations or floating point operations per second, hence flop/s. Not everyone in this field agrees it's the best possible way to compare machines, but it is one way.

By using GPUs to accelerate the performance of the Tianhe-1A, the machine can achieve more floating point operations per second.

"The way most of us look at the Chinese machine, is it's very good at this particular problem (the Linpack benchmark), but not problems the user community is interested in," said Gropp.

For those worried that this is a blow to the United States' leadership in supercomputing, it's actually not a huge cause for alarm if you consider the provenance of the pieces of the Chinese system. Tianhe-1A is a Linux computer built from components from Intel and Nvidia, points out Charlie Zender, professor of Earth Systems Science at the University of California at Irvine.

A timeline of supercomputing speed. (Click to enlarge.)

A timeline of supercomputing speed. (Click to enlarge.)

(Credit: AMD)

"So we find ourselves admiring an achievement that certainly couldn't have been done without the know-how of Silicon Valley...and an operating system designed mostly by the United States and Europe," Zender said. "It's a time for reflection that we are now at a stage where a country that's motivated and has the resources can take off-the-shelf components and assemble the world's fastest supercomputer."

Supercomputers will likely get faster every year, points out Jeremy Smith, director of the Center for Molecular Biophysics at the University of Tennessee, so China's rise to the top this month isn't the end of the story. The list will likely be reordered again in June, when the next edition of the Top500 is released.

"What you find historically with these supercomputers is they become the normal machines five or 10 years later that everybody uses," said Smith, who oversees some projects run on Jaguar. "The Jaguar machine that we're so amazed at right now, it could be every university or company has one" eventually.

And of course these high-performance computer systems aren't just made to race each other, most scientists in the field would argue. They're made to solve complex problems, with eventual real-world consequences like climate change and alternative fuel production.

Smith argues that research like what's being done on Jaguar to solve the problem of superconductivity at high temperatures couldn't necessarily be done on Tianhe-1A effectively because it requires very efficient computing and coming up with the software on a computer to do that well is difficult.

But what China has accomplished is still important for supercomputing, argues Gropp, who called the number of flop/s Tianhe-1A achieved "remarkable."

"I don't want to downplay what they've done," he said. "It's like pooh-poohing the original Toyota. The first Toyota was a pile of junk. But a few years later they were eating our lunch."

It's not the first time that a non-U.S. machine has topped the rankings--the Japanese NEC Earth Simulator did it in 2004. The U.S. of course bounced back, and as of today has 275, or more than half of the systems, on the Top 500 list. China is next with 42 systems, and Japan and Germany are tied with 26 each. Still, there is concern that China's focused concentration of resources on supercomputing is fomenting a threat to the U.S.' long-term dominance there. But just trying to score the highest on the Linpack benchmark--something that any group of researchers with enough money could do fairly easily--is short-sighted.

"What we should be focusing on is not losing our leadership and being able to apply computing to a broad range of science and engineering problems," said Gropp, who is also deputy director of research at UI's Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies.

The Presidential Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) is currently working on a report that addresses this exact topic, and didn't have a comment when contacted. Recently PCAST did release a draft of a document that calls for more funding for scientific computing very soon after news of Tianhe-1A's speed began to spread. And President Barack Obama weighed in briefly on the topic in a speech two weeks ago, calling for increased science funding specifically for high-performance computing.

But it's not as if the supercomputing community in the U.S has been sitting still while China sneaked up behind them. There are other projects in the works at U.S. labs that are planning on blowing Jaguar and Tianhe-1A out of the water in terms of speed.

Currently the University of Illinois Urbana-Champagne and the National Science Foundation is building Blue Waters, a supercomputer that researchers say will be the fastest in the world when it is turned on sometime next year.

The Department of Energy, which owns Oak Ridge's Jaguar supercomputer, is already looking at moving from the current peta-scale computing (a quadrillion floating point operations per second) to exa-scale computing (a quintillion floating point operations per second), a speed a thousand times faster than Jaguar is currently capable of processing at. It's a goal that's still a ways out there, but the work is under way.

"To get there in the next five to 10 years, to get to 10 million cores in one room, is a major technical challenge," noted University of Tennessee's Jeremy Smith. "It's going to be fundamentally different than before. It's a hardware problem, and getting the software working is a major challenge indeed."

For more statistics on the systems in the Top500 list, please see Top500.org.

(CNet)
Tommy Chung
發表 发表于:2010.10.28 06:14:46 PM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

Only Chen
發表 发表于:2010.10.26 11:05:29 AM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

微軟:個人雲端 讓你自由揮灑

http://mag.udn.com/mag/digital/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=279338

 

Tommy Chung
發表 发表于:2010.10.21 11:26:29 AM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

微軟9成研發資源 投入雲端

http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/101021/4/2fdew.html

 

Tommy Chung
發表 发表于:2010.10.06 11:19:52 AM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

明年漢諾威電腦展聚焦雲端

 

(中央社)為了更貼近廠商、買主、和一般消費者的需求,全球科技業的盛事德國漢諾威電腦展(CeBIT),明年起會場將分成4大區塊,而雲端計算將是展覽的重頭戲。

 

由於巴塞隆納全球行動通訊大會(Mobile WorldCongress)和柏林國際消費電子展(IFA)等同性質展覽的競爭,漢諾威電腦展近年來陷入參展廠商和參觀人數皆下滑的窘境,主辦單位亟思轉型。

 

明年3月1日揭幕的展覽,將一連舉辦5天,會場將首度分成4大區塊,分別滿足專業應用、官方機構、學術研究單位、以及一般消費者的需要。

 

漢諾威電腦展執行長勞恩(Ernst Raue)表示,雖然半年後才開幕,但大部份的領導廠商已經承諾參展,甚至擴大展出規模。

 

他強調,2011年展覽的焦點雲端服務,「將為資訊和通訊產業的結構帶來根本性的改變」。

 

明年漢諾威電腦展的主題國是土耳其,勞恩指出,土耳其不只經濟成長迅速,也是進軍中東市場的據點,對資通訊業而言潛力十足。

(Yahoo!)

Tommy Chung
發表 发表于:2010.09.27 11:25:55 AM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

中華電、IBM攜手闖雲端

http://news.chinatimes.com/tech/0,5249,12050901x122010092700308,00.html

 

Tommy Chung
發表 发表于:2010.08.13 10:57:11 AM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

If The Net Had Been Made in 2010 Instead of 1995

The recent Google deal that may end net neutrality got us thinking about Sandra Bullock's classic 1995 thriller, The Net. Specifically, what would a trailer for The Net look like if it was made today? We decided to find out.

Back in 1995, it was easy to think of the Internet as a scary place where the powerful could prey on the weak. 15 years later, life is imitating art, and Google has become the villain that The Net promised us.

Here's our original video of what the trailer for The Net would look like if the movie were made today.

If you are interested in sharing this video on your own web site, please email us at tips@gawker.tv.

Steven Wang
發表 发表于:2008.02.18 11:41:14 AM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

應該就是類似網格運算吧

軟體資安又是另外一個領域了

Korbin Lan
發表 发表于:2008.02.15 03:33:27 PM    文章主题: Re: 雲端運算究竟為何?

有點有聽沒有懂
概念是不是跟網格(Grid)類似啊
Jalen Chung
發表 发表于:2008.02.05 11:25:27 AM    文章主题: 雲端運算究竟為何?

以下為一場探討雲端運算的小型Workshop影片,主持人和出席者分別為:

 

Moderator

Andrea LaPaughProfessor of  Computer  Science, Princeton University);

panelist:

Reihan Salam The Atlantic Monthly);

Jesse RobbinsO'Reilly Radar);

Jonathan Rochelle Google);

 

 

 

先進前輩們可否對雲端運算提供專業解說,讓我們對此能有更近一步的瞭解?